Are we really debating this?!

Just a quick thought:

On Sunday NFL Countdown this morning they were debating whether or not it was a good idea to take away PacMan Jones' personal security detail so that he doesn't get into anymore trouble. Now, I'm not going to pretend I've followed his situation, but what I do know is that he is no longer a part of my Tennessee Titans and was picked up by the Cowboys. Instead of taking the opportunity to play in the NFL and make exuberant amounts of money, he decided to party, drink, fight, and get arrested numerous times, leading to his suspension and subsequent release from the Titans. After coming back from his initial suspension, he was given extra personal police security - like they don't have better things to do - in order to keep him in line, I mean heaven forbid he use self control. Did that help? NO! What did he do? Assault one of them!

So, now, for some unknown reason, the NFL Commissioner thinks he should be allowed to come back sans the personal security detail, and people are wondering if that's a good idea. My thoughts: If he isn't mature enough to be in public without his own personal police force he might not be the kind of player the NFL needs! Don't know, just a guess.

This whole situation reminds me of a line from Liar, Liar where Jim Carrey is on the phone with one of his perpetual law breaking clients and the guy has just robbed a bank and needs legal advice. When asked what to do, Jim Carrey answers:

"Quit breaking the law a@@hole!"

I think that would be proper response to whether or not Mr. PacMan needs his own security!